Q: Could you share more about your journey with OCBC and your current role? Hear more about his leadership journey with OCBC. The lessons from those in senior-leader positions who practice hands-off leadership and their eventual failure (unless their style changes), is something that will be addressed more here at a balance between hands-off and hands-on leadership is an art, and for Ow Yong Weng Leong, Vice President, Group Brand & Communications, it is one that he continues to hone. Our attention has been recently drawn to the City of Baltimore and its continued slide into criminal violence. Organizations eventually will begin to deteriorate when such a leader is in charge.
This type of leader exists when things are going well and problems are small and rare. No amount of resources (money, experts, availability of time, etc.) can help a hands-off leader succeed when circumstances are difficult. Her campaign also never came together it was composed of many good people but without direction. President (other than she would be the first woman president). Her campaign never really had a message and she never answered the question why she wanted to be the next U.S. She left the running of her campaign to staffers, outside experts, and long-term friends. The best example of a hands-off leader is Hillary Clinton. This can lead to serious problems when the relevant experience of the staff is inadequate or when their personal integrity goes unchecked. In such circumstances, running of the organization is left to those at the staff level often a de facto decision by the senior leader. On the other hand, hands-off leaders are more concerned about their personal status and privileges. Laissez-faire leaders monitor the performance of their employees, give regular feedback, and provide a positive work environment where good work can be accomplished with minimal interference. Largely, such a slide is due to a leader whose self-interest reinforces their executive laziness. On the one hand, laissez-faire leadership styles can slip into hands-off leadership easily. To the military, hands-off leadership is an abomination to good order and discipline those soldierly traits needed in war and peace.
military, as an institution, is concerned about the recent cultural shift toward advancing this type of leader. This type of leader is rarely discussed but is more common than most of us would like to admit. Today, I refer to hands-off leaders as those leaders who know what is happening, are not directly involved, trust others to do a good job, but also are who are unwilling to make decisions. Hands-off leadership, incorrectly referred to as Laissez-Faire leadership, is a topic of intense debate in senior military circles.
0 kommentar(er)
